|
According to a 1999
report written by John Orr of USC’s Center for Religion and Civic
Culture, “In recent years, the city of Los Angeles has surpassed London
and New York as the world’s most religiously pluralist metropolitan
region. With more than 600 separate faith communities established in
Los Angeles neighborhoods, many with different languages and a large
number of racial/ethnic enclaves, most clergy and lay people remain
strangers to those of differing faiths.” The project “Does
Religion Kill?” is a response to these statistics.
Created as a catalytic forum for exchange, the exhibition will
include an interactive dialogue wall piece in which Los Angeles public of
various faiths and ideologies are invited to contribute thoughts about the
theme.
The inspiration for
this show, originally birthed and debuted in the city of Istanbul where an
obvious clash of civilizations exists, has now uniquely manifested itself
through a pluralist American, and more specifically Angelino, perspective.
The artists selected represent a wide array of ethnic backgrounds,
approaches to the topic – both direct and ambiguous, and mediums
utilized. All the works,
however, converge in the way each artist has reached from a very personal
core to boldly grapple with an extremely provocative question.
Ramsey Robinson’s
raw ability, through the use of video manipulation mixed with private
audio conversation, to freeze frame fleeting moments of pure human
emotion, helps his work connect with the viewer on a very primal level and
makes it ideal for this exhibition as a personal approach to a very
personal topic. Marquis
Lewis’ bold willingness to take risks, apparent by the uproar elicited
after creating a traditional representation of La Virgin in which Mary’s
face is replaced by a grotesque skull, makes him a compelling choice for
this project. Noah Haytin’s
western roots mixed with his use of Islamic iconography make his
presentation of the positive/negative dichotomy of religion a fresh take
on the question. While angels are the pervasive theme in the current works of
Melissa Trochez, the whimsical way in which she combines paint and
textile, aid her attempts to contrast religious experience with personal
spiritual encounter. The
piece chosen from Christine Morla’s very personal and therapeutic series
of masochistic drawings perhaps contains the most layers of possible
interpretation as it experiments with thresholds of pain and intricacies
of the human breaking point. Katrina
Erickson, with her clean execution and use of negative space, effectively
demands the viewer’s participation to decode her message and to awe at
her transformation of the benign into something forcefully significant.
Burt Payne’s creation of the iconic Last Supper on something as
nonreligious and discard able as an aluminum tv- tray, has been included in
the show as a clever, satirical statement.
A noted and controversial political activist, unfeigning in the
face of explosive reaction to her works, Persian born Amitis Motevalli is
likewise anticipated to create a very satirical and provocative
installation piece. Bill Barminski’s piece, in which the thick, red letters
“LIES” steal attention from a fading image of The Lord’s Supper, is
bold and unapologetic in its message.
As a young, second-generation Iranian woman living in America,
Samira Yamin uses symbolism in both her content and medium to tackle
pertinent issues involving the clash between East and West with a fresh
and centrific perspective. It
is an honor to include a work by acclaimed artist Raymond Pettibon in
which he challenges a traditional religious perspective on creation.
Finally, Zara Kriegstein’s ability to exaggerate and bring to
light what is normally hidden or taboo makes her an obvious choice to
elicit controversial discussion.
|
|